Press Advisory: Denver Architects Convention Challenged with New 9/11 WTC Evidence

AE911Truth Contact: Kelly David
Phone: (925) 939-9002

Denver Architects Convention Challenged
with New 9/11 WTC Evidence

Public Invited to June 21 Presentation

Group says official reports Deeply Flawed
Calls for New Investigation

Local Contact: Frances Shure
Phone:  303-909-2053
Non-profit org: Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
Announcing:  Richard Gage, AIA, Architect and founder of AE911Truth

Live Presentation – June 21, 2013, 7:00pm, Rm #110
Evidence Booth –  June 20 – 22, Exhibition Floor – #1355

Where: Colorado Convention Center, 700 14th St., Denver, CO
Topic:  “Did You Know a Third Tower Fell on 9/11 – WTC Building 7”

Denver, CO — Thursday June 20 through Saturday June 22, the nonprofit group Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth), will host the new evidence at an exhibitor’s booth at the 2013 annual convention of the American Institute of Architects.

AE911Truth founder and CEO Richard Gage, AIA, Architect will be presenting the new evidence in a controversial multimedia presentation with Q&A on Friday night June 21 at 7pm in Room #110 also at the Colorado Convention Center in Denver.

Gage represents more than 1,900 licensed and/or degreed architects and engineers who have signed a petition calling for a new, independent investigation into the 9/11 attacks. These building professionals are joined by more than 17,000 other supporters, including a broad professional cross-section of American society, including chemists, physicists, current and former service members, and others. Video loops and free literature will be on hand to help booth visitors understand the group’s evidence and concerns.

Their milestone DVD 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out, which was aired/pledged locally at PBS affiliate Colorado Public TV, will be provided to the 14,000 architects in attendance. The documentary, which features 43 technical and building experts including high-rise architects, structural and fire protection engineers, etc., had become the most watched & shared video on the national website.

Volunteers will be presenting scientific evidence that the group says contradicts the official explanation of what brought down the World Trade Center twin towers and little-known Building 7.

The group’s website cites evidence for explosive demolition as the cause of the destruction of the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11. AE911Truth points in particular to the destruction of a third skyscraper, 47-story World Trade Center 7. This building was not hit by an aircraft, yet collapsed straight down in less than seven seconds for more than 100 feet of free-fall – showing no resistance at all. Experts note that this undisputed fact alone rules out the official collapse explanation, which is based only on fire.

Free-fall means that virtually all of the supporting heavy steel structure was shattered and moved out of the way by something other than the weight of the upper section. If the upper section had been crushing weakened, overloaded steel, the collapse would necessarily have proceeded at a slower pace than free-fall. According to the group, this follows from simple high school physics.

NIST, the federal agency last assigned to investigate the destruction, admitted both of the key facts above, after being confronted by physics instructor David Chandler at a technical briefing. Yet the agency left unchanged its conclusion that fire alone brought down these steel-framed skyscrapers, for the first time in history, evenly, rapidly, and exactly in the manner of a classic controlled demolition.

Both the 9/11 Commission Report and the leader of the NIST study admitted that the twin towers also came down “essentially in free fall.” Yet the vast majority of the NIST report on the twin towers admittedly analyzed only the conditions that brought the buildings to the point where they were poised for collapse, without analyzing the details of the collapses themselves. The report’s authors complained of inadequate computer power to conduct a simulation of the actual collapses.

Yet several simple computer simulations written by independent researchers, notably those by Jim Hoffman ( and Stephen Keeling ( have been available online for many years now. They show that on very conservative assumptions, the destruction of each tower should have taken much longer or should have come to a halt long before reaching the ground.

AE911Truth bases its conclusions solely on forensic evidence and does not engage in conspiracy theories or in assigning blame for the destruction. The group’s conclusions are shared by hundreds of scientists, senior-level military, intelligence and government officials; pilots and aviation professionals; scholars and university professors; 9/11 survivors and family members; and media professionals around the world.

Not a Fringe Phenomenon

The 9/11 Truth movement, which Time magazine called “a mainstream political reality,” is gaining rapid momentum.  Gage has presented more than 300 times at events covering 82 U.S. Cities and 27 foreign countries.  Fox TV’s KMPH (Fresno) interview of Gage attained over 200,000 YouTube views in two weeks.

Energetic Material Found in World Trade Center Dust

A Danish chemist, AE911Truth petition signer Dr. Niels Harrit, was interviewed by Danish network television on April 6, 2012. The interview, now viewed nearly 250,000 times, discusses the advanced nano-engineered residues found in the World Trade Center dust by an international team. These residues point to the use of nanothermite in the Towers’ destruction. Nanothermite was developed in the 1990s by US national laboratories and defense contractors, and takes advantage of the highly exothermic thermite reaction plus small particle size to increase the power of explosives and rocket fuels. These troubling new findings are shown in Gage’s presentation.

The convention takes place at the Colorado Convention Center, 700 14th Street, Denver June 21-22. The group is expected to be one of the only nonprofit organizations attending the convention.

Colorado 9-11 Visibility Does Not Endorse Webster Tarpley at the Mercury Cafe

Below, please find a message from Michael Wolsey of Colorado 9-11 Visibility-

If you are on the Colorado 9-11 Visibility mailing list, you might have seen a couple of e-mails recently which deviate from the topic of September 11th.  From the beginning, it has been the policy of Colorado 9-11 Visibility, which include our public events, website and e-mail list, to focus only on information which directly relates to the events of September 11th.  It was agreed by all that there could be no compromise on this policy and as a result, our group has been able avoided controversies surrounding such topics as immigration reform, gun control, left/right division, UFO’s, etc.  However, two recent e-mails sent out to the Colorado 9-11 Visibility e-mail list has broken this policy and should be disregarded.

On March 17, 2013, an email was sent via the Colorado 9-11 Visibility e-mail list titled “Another Opportunity for Transparency: UFO Forum at First Universalist Church of Denver”.

While we encourage research on topics important to the human race, Colorado 9-11 Visibility neither encourages, nor discourages research conducted into understanding the world-wide UFO phenomenon.  We simply leave this work to others whose interest leads them down that path.  While we acknowledge an individual’s right to pursue research into subjects to which they find of interest, as a group, Colorado 9-11 Visibility remains neutral on the topic of UFO research.

Webster_TarpleyOn April 7, 2013, another announcement was sent out via the Colorado 9-11 Visibility email list titled “Webster Tarpley at the Mercury Cafe on Sunday”.  This was the second of two questionable emails which should have never been sent because it was not approved by the group.

Those who know me well and have been involved in the 9-11 movement for some time, know and understand why I oppose any affiliation or endorsement of Webster Tarpley.  Fran Shure was and is well aware of the events which shaped my opinion of Mr. Tarpley, yet still chose to send out an e-mail endorsing an event where Mr. Tarpley was scheduled to be the keynote speaker.  I cannot, in a few sentences, sum up why I believe Mr. Tarpley to be a disinformation specialist.  However, below please find a brief synopsis and links to a few sources which explain in great detail why Mr. Tarpley should be avoided by any serious activist.

Webster Tarpley has a very dubious background going back many years.  For a long time, Mr. Tarpley was a key figure in the Lyndon LaRouche political cult.  This group is well known for it’s racist and anti-Semitic views and even though Mr. Tarpley claims he is no longer part of the LaRouche cult, his views remain largely unchanged.  Mr. Tarpley is also a big supporter of disinformation surrounding the 9-11 attacks and those personalities who push disinformation.  He consistently has used his speaking engagements and radio program to push unproven theories about September 11th and to attack and demonize legitimate 9-11 and anti-war activists, including myself.

As you will see if you take the time to research Webster Tarpley, I have first hand knowledge of the underhanded tactics used by this disciple of Lyndon LaRouche.   You see, a tiger cannot change its’ stripes and Webster Tarpley is no different.

My experience with Mr. Tarpley began as a result of the efforts of many 9-11 activists who had for years been trying to forge alliances with the anti-war activists.  After all, none of the wars would have been possible had it not been for the events of September 11th, so we saw anti-war activists as our natural ally.  We understood that if we could get them to just look at the 9-11 evidence, they would join us and together we would be a viable force for truth and an end to the 9-11 wars.

Webster Tarpley, for reasons only known to him, using well known LaRouche tactics of deception, forged a document known as the Kennebunkport Warning.  This “document” purported to predict another 9-11 style attack and appeared to be signed by 4 well known and prominent anti-war activists.  It was later revealed that these signatures were either forgeries or obtained using dishonest means and all 4 of these anti-war activists denied signing such a document.  In what appeared to be a coordinated and orchestrated event, Mr. Tarpley then proceeded to attack these anti-war activists as liars and worse.

When this scandal, initiated by Mr. Tarpley became public, I was among a handful of 9-11 activists who publicly spoke up in defense of the anti-war activists.  As a result, we were attacked by Mr. Tarpley and very publicly referred to in many derogatory ways including references that we are part of the FBI and COINTELPRO.  This was done both at a 9-11 anniversary event in New York City as well as on Mr. Tarpley’s radio program.

If you would like to learn more about these events and Mr. Tarpley’s shady past, please see the links below.

Webster Tarpley has deep and longtime connections to Lyndon LaRouche.  This information is key to understanding who Webster Tarpley really is.
Lyndon LaRouche Watch

The Kennebunkport Warning Hoax

9-11 Synthetic Error – The meltdown of Webster G. Tarpley

9-11 Synthetic Error – The meltdown of Webster G. Tarpley

Kennebunkport Warning Cartoon: We are Funded by the Ford Foundation Because we Oppose Divisive Language?

The Kennebunkport Warning Controversy Reviewed


Colorado Public Television to Air “Ethos: A Time for Change” Thursday, January 17, 2013

Colorado Public Television (CPT12) will air this excellent documentary this Thursday, January 17, 7:00 PM on Ethos_DVD1Channel 12.1. It will be streamed on the web only during this live airing.

Here is the link where you can see all of the repeats of the film,  and where you can stream it:

Please consider watching it and show your support by donating to our most independent station, one of the few willing to present subject matter the corporate media refuses to touch. [Read more…]